Still Waiting ArmorofChrist777..

[Mickulz]

I am still waiting for the answer I asked you in a previous post:

hbgonline.proboards62.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=politics&thread=1201752130&page=1

You stated:
"Here is a partial list of what would be fixed by eliminating the Federal Reserve and kicking those blood-sucking international bankers out of here once and for all (Andrew Jackson booted them in the 1830's - setting their plans back by nearly 100 years):

Inflation
Devaluation of the currency
Destruction of the middle class
Jobs going overseas
Foreign wars for oil
Our dependency on fossil fuels in general - because we can make ethanol from hemp much cheaper and less energy intensive than from corn, and all the other alternative energy technologies that are suppressed right now.
Mercury in vaccines
Poisons in our food and water
A media that distorts the facts, omits facts, and glorifies the homosexual lifestyle, the occult, and materialism
Rigged elections
Nefarious Influence on our representatives
A broken border
Loss of liberties in the name of the War on Scarism"

And I asked you to explain how getting rid of The Fed would solve two of the issues you stated:

1.Mercury in vaccines
2.A media that distorts the facts, omits facts, and glorifies the homosexual lifestyle, the occult, and materialism

I, or we, have yet to hear your answer. I did not forget about this, and I am still waiting.

[freddyv]

I think he started rattling things off and got carried away. I kinda felt a little embarrassed for him as he kept digging himself deeper and pretty much lost all credibility for his argument.

this happens a lot with these types...they get a bit overzealous.

[BT]

Freddy, that was a short list; it could have very well been much longer - I did not rattle those things off at random.

It doesn't matter what sources I quote, Mickulz, you will deny that they provide any evidence, make a point, or support a conclusion. I could direct you to a number of websites, books or films. But it doesn't matter; you will demand impossible proofs.

For the rest of you interested in the connections between the families that own the Federal Reserve and the programs they push, such as mercury in the vaccines, Alex Jones' "Endgame" is a good place to start.

It's so easy for a logical mind to connect the reasoning behind the purchasing of shares in major media. The FED started buying up the media in the 1930's and, now, owns, or significantly influences, most of it.

"Rockefeller also controls the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the sole purpose of which is to aid in stimulating greater interest in foreign affairs and in a one world government. Nearly every major newscaster belongs to the Council on Foreign Relations. The Council on Foreign Relations controls many major newspapers and magazines. Additionally, major corporations owned by FED shareholders are the source of huge advertising revenues which surely would influence the media. It can be no wonder why groups such as the FED receive minimal, if any, press attention."

www.rense.com/ufo2/fedrez.htm

Research; connect the dots; come to your own conclusions; and don't believe the Masonic disinfo that Mickulz spews. He will defend the Fed, the CFR, NAU, Rockefeller and all the rest of that NWO crap to the hilt.

[seanx]

......good answer, AOC.........Mickulz?........this is like tennis.......

[Mickulz]

You still are not showing how eliminating the FED would solve these issues. You assume that is the FED was eliminated those people you point out would stop caring and not continue. I am asking what makes you believe that.

I am not defending the Fed. I am defending the idea that just simply getting rid of something does not usually accomplish what most think it would. I have before that I have no problem if the Fed gets disbanded, removed, closed down, as LONG AS A SUITABLE replacement is put in place. So far, I have not heard one person suggest a suitable replacement.

So basically you are saying that without the Fed, there would be no mercury in the vaccines, and the media would be less bias. I am simply asking how that relates. Because I still do not see it.

Show me a plan, and I will be fine. Show me a single study where it shows that action X directly effects action Y.