|
Post by freddyv on Feb 14, 2008 19:38:17 GMT -5
Superdelegates are a HORRIBLE idea. Let the people decide! Superdelegates get campaign cash Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor February 14, 2008 03:54 PM Many of the superdelegates who could well decide the Democratic presidential nominee have already been plied with campaign contributions by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, a new study shows. "While it would be unseemly for the candidates to hand out thousands of dollars to primary voters, or to the delegates pledged to represent the will of those voters, elected officials serving as superdelegates have received about $890,000 from Obama and Clinton in the form of campaign contributions over the last three years," the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics reported today. About half the 800 superdelegates -- elected officials, party leaders, and others -- have committed to either Clinton or Obama, though they can change their minds until the convention. Obama's political action committee has doled out more than $694,000 to superdelegates since 2005, the study found, and of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000. Clinton's political action committee has distributed about $195,000 to superdelegates, and only 13 of the 109 who had announced for her have received money, totaling about $95,000. the story: www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/02/superdelegates.htmlthe study: www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=336
|
|
|
Post by freddyv on Mar 28, 2008 14:00:22 GMT -5
it seems as though superdelegates are unconstitutional. I haven't thoroughly reasearched the topic, but I'm not sure why this wasn't brought up when the idea came about.
from the US Constitution, Article 2, Section 1:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
|
|
|
Post by seanx on Mar 28, 2008 14:49:09 GMT -5
....................GREAT POINT, FREDDY................
unfortunately none of elected officials pay attention to The Constitution anymore........if I was able, I'd be filing suit on this one (a class action suit)...........
|
|
|
Post by freddyv on Mar 28, 2008 15:08:36 GMT -5
the whole situation really irritates me. I'm not a dem so I guess I shouldn't care, but it just doesn't seem right that a select few can throw their weight around if they like and decide an election.
I guess the loophole here is that this is not the general election. I don't know if this rule would apply to primary elections. it's still shady though!
|
|